CVE Database

Search and browse vulnerability records from NVD

Showing 50 of 34812 CVEs

CVE ID Severity Description EPSS Published
6.5 MEDIUM

The Restrict File Access plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2 via the output() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information.

1.4% 2025-06-14
6.1 MEDIUM

The WP URL Shortener plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'url_shortener_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-14
6.1 MEDIUM

The XiSearch bar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'xisearch-key-config' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-14
4.3 MEDIUM

The Yougler Blogger Profile Page plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, v1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yougler-plugin.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-14
6.4 MEDIUM

The kk Youtube Video plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'kkytv' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 0.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-14
6.1 MEDIUM

The Zen Sticky Social plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'zen-social-sticky/zen-sticky-social.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-14
6.1 MEDIUM

The Easy Flashcards plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ef_settings_submenu' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.2% 2025-06-14
6.4 MEDIUM

The StreamWeasels Kick Integration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘status-classic-offline-text’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.3 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-14
6.4 MEDIUM

The Click to Chat plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘data-no_number’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.22 to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-14
4.3 MEDIUM

The AI Image Lab – Free AI Image Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'wpz-ai-images' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's API key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-14
6.4 MEDIUM

The DIOT SCADA with MQTT plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'diot' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-14
5.9 MEDIUM

The UserPro - Community and User Profile WordPress Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.10 via the userpro_fbconnect() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information.

1.3% 2025-06-14
4.3 MEDIUM

The Seraphinite Accelerator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.27.21. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'OnAdminApi_CacheOpBegin' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform several administrative actions, including deleting the cache, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-14
4.3 MEDIUM

In ExtremeCloud Universal ZTNA, a syntax error in the 'searchKeyword' condition caused queries to bypass the owner_id filter. This issue may allow users to search data across the entire table instead of being restricted to their specific owner_id.

0.2% 2025-06-13
6.1 MEDIUM

A flaw was found in GIMP. An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the GIMP "Despeckle" plug-in. The issue occurs due to unchecked multiplication of image dimensions, such as width, height, and bytes-per-pixel (img_bpp), which can result in allocating insufficient memory and subsequently performing out-of-bounds writes. This issue could lead to heap corruption, a potential denial of service (DoS), or arbitrary code execution in certain scenarios.

0.0% 2025-06-13
6.1 MEDIUM

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in OpenC3 COSMOS before v6.0.2 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload into the URL parameter.

0.3% 2025-06-13
6.5 MEDIUM

External control of file name or path issue exists in RICOH Streamline NX V3 PC Client versions 3.5.0 to 3.242.0. If an attacker sends a specially crafted request, arbitrary files in the file system can be overwritten with log data.

0.3% 2025-06-13
5.5 MEDIUM

The Auto Attachments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

0.2% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The Game Review Block plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘className’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-13
5.6 MEDIUM

Worker process denial of service through file read operation. .A vulnerability exists in the Master's “pub_ret” method which is exposed to all minions. The un-sanitized input value “jid” is used to construct a path which is then opened for reading. An attacker could exploit this vulnerabilities by attempting to read from a filename that will not return any data, e.g. by targeting a pipe node on the proc file system.

0.1% 2025-06-13
5.6 MEDIUM

File contents overwrite the VirtKey class is called when “on-demand pillar” data is requested and uses un-validated input to create paths to the “pki directory”. The functionality is used to auto-accept Minion authentication keys based on a pre-placed “authorization file” at a specific location and is present in the default configuration.

0.1% 2025-06-13
6.3 MEDIUM

Arbitrary directory creation or file deletion. In the find_file method of the GitFS class, a path is created using os.path.join using unvalidated input from the “tgt_env” variable. This can be exploited by an attacker to delete any file on the Master's process has permissions to.

0.1% 2025-06-13
4.2 MEDIUM

Directory traversal attack in minion file cache creation. The master's default cache is vulnerable to a directory traversal attack. Which could be leveraged to write or overwrite 'cache' files outside of the cache directory.

0.3% 2025-06-13
6.7 MEDIUM

An attacker with access to a minion key can exploit the 'on demand' pillar functionality with a specially crafted git url which could cause and arbitrary command to be run on the master with the same privileges as the master process.

0.1% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The salt.auth.pki module does not properly authenticate callers. The "password" field contains a public certificate which is validated against a CA certificate by the module. This is not pki authentication, as the caller does not need access to the corresponding private key for the authentication attempt to be accepted.

0.1% 2025-06-13
5.3 MEDIUM

The Traffic Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the tfcm_maybe_set_bot_flags() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disabled bot logging.

0.1% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The IndieBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘kind’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 0.13.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-13
4.4 MEDIUM

The Telegram for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

0.2% 2025-06-13
4.3 MEDIUM

The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-13
4.3 MEDIUM

The WP Sliding Login/Dashboard Panel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wp_sliding_panel_user_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-13
6.1 MEDIUM

The Link Shield plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the link_shield_menu_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

0.0% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The ACF Onyx Poll plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘class’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.9 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The Color Palette plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘hex’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.2% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The IRM Newsroom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'irmcalendarview' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.1% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The IRM Newsroom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'irmflat' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.1% 2025-06-13
6.4 MEDIUM

The IRM Newsroom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'irmeventlist' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

0.1% 2025-06-13
6.5 MEDIUM

Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset). * The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. * The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. * The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. * The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via one of: * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String), or * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, ASCII) * The filename is not derived from user-supplied input. * The filename is derived from user-supplied input but sanitized by the application. * The attacker cannot inject malicious content in the downloaded content of the response. Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.7 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.20 * 6.0.5 - 6.0.28 * Older, unsupported versions are not affected MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.8OSS6.1.x6.1.21OSS6.0.x6.0.29 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. CWE-113 in `Content-Disposition` handling in VMware Spring Framework versions 6.0.5 to 6.2.7 allows remote attackers to launch Reflected File Download (RFD) attacks via unsanitized user input in `ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset)` with non-ASCII charsets.

0.2% 2025-06-12
6.8 MEDIUM

Description: VMware AVI Load Balancer contains an authenticated blind SQL Injection vulnerability. VMware has evaluated the severity of the issue to be in the Moderate severity range https://www.broadcom.com/support/vmware-services/security-response  with a maximum CVSSv3 base score of 6.8 https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3-0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N . Known Attack Vectors: An authenticated malicious user with network access may be able to use specially crafted SQL queries to gain database access. Resolution: To remediate CVE-2025-41233 apply the patches to the Avi Controller listed in the 'Fixed Version' column of the 'Response Matrix' found below. Workarounds: None. Additional Documentation: None. Acknowledgements: VMware would like to thank Alexandru Copaceanu https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandru-copaceanu-b39aaa1a8/  for reporting this issue to us. Notes: None.   Response Matrix: ProductVersionRunning OnCVECVSSv4SeverityFixed VersionWorkaroundsAdditional DocumentsVMware Avi Load Balancer30.1.1AnyCVE-2025-41233 6.8 https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3-0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N Moderate 30.1.2-2p3 https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-security-load-balancing/avi-load-balancer/avi-load-balancer/30-1/vmware-avi-load-balancer-release-notes/release-notes-30-1-2.html NoneNoneVMware Avi Load Balancer30.1.2AnyCVE-2025-41233 6.8 https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3-0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N Moderate 30.1.2-2p3 https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-security-load-balancing/avi-load-balancer/avi-load-balancer/30-1/vmware-avi-load-balancer-release-notes/release-notes-30-1-2.html NoneNoneVMware Avi Load Balancer30.2.1AnyCVE-2025-41233 6.8 https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3-0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N Moderate 30.2.1-2p6 https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-security-load-balancing/avi-load-balancer/avi-load-balancer/30-2/vmware-avi-load-balancer-release-notes/release-notes-for-avi-load-balancer-version-30-2-1.html NoneNoneVMware Avi Load Balancer30.2.2AnyCVE-2025-41233 6.8 https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3-0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N Moderate 30.2.2-2p5 https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-security-load-balancing/avi-load-balancer/avi-load-balancer/30-2/vmware-avi-load-balancer-release-notes/release-notes-for-avi-load-balancer-version-30-2-2.html NoneNoneVMware Avi Load Balancer30.2.3AnyCVE-2025-41233N/AN/AUnaffectedNoneNoneVMware Avi Load Balancer31.1.1AnyCVE-2025-41233 6.8 https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3-0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N Moderate 31.1.1-2p2 https://techdocs.broadcom.com/us/en/vmware-security-load-balancing/avi-load-balancer/avi-load-balancer/31-1/vmware-avi-load-balancer-release-notes/Release-Note-Section-20627.html NoneNone CWE-89 in the Avi Load Balancer component of VMware allows an authenticated attacker to execute blind SQL injections in versions 30.1.1, 30.1.2, 30.2.1, and 30.2.2 due to improper input validation, enabling unauthorized database access.

0.3% 2025-06-12
4.4 MEDIUM

An improper validation of integrity check value vulnerability exists in AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited, could allow a miscreant with elevated privileges to modify PI Connector for CygNet local data files (cache and buffers) in a way that causes the connector service to become unresponsive.

0.0% 2025-06-12
5.5 MEDIUM

A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in AVEVA PI Connector for CygNet Versions 1.6.14 and prior that, if exploited, could allow an administrator miscreant with local access to the connector admin portal to persist arbitrary JavaScript code that will be executed by other users who visit affected pages.

0.1% 2025-06-12
6.5 MEDIUM

AVEVA PI Data Archive products are vulnerable to an uncaught exception that, if exploited, could allow an authenticated user to shut down certain necessary PI Data Archive subsystems, resulting in a denial of service.

0.1% 2025-06-12
6.5 MEDIUM

A cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in AVEVA PI Web API version 2023 SP1 and prior that, if exploited, could allow an authenticated attacker (with privileges to create/update annotations or upload media files) to persist arbitrary JavaScript code that will be executed by users who were socially engineered to disable content security policy protections while rendering annotation attachments from within a web browser.

0.1% 2025-06-12
5.4 MEDIUM

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the EuroInformation MoneticoPaiement module before 1.1.1 for PrestaShop allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the TPE, societe, MAC, reference, or aliascb parameter to transaction.php, validation.php, or callback.php.

0.1% 2025-06-12
6.5 MEDIUM

The created backup files are unencrypted, making the application vulnerable for gathering sensitive information by downloading and decompressing the backup files.

0.3% 2025-06-12
6.5 MEDIUM

The application uses a weak password hash function, allowing an attacker to crack the weak password hash to gain access to an FTP user account.

0.2% 2025-06-12
6.5 MEDIUM

A service supports the use of a deprecated and unsafe TLS version. This could be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways or spoof identities of other users or devices, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the device.

0.2% 2025-06-12
5.3 MEDIUM

The FTP server’s login mechanism does not restrict authentication attempts, allowing an attacker to brute-force user passwords and potentially compromising the FTP server.

0.4% 2025-06-12
4.2 MEDIUM

The application fails to implement several security headers. These headers help increase the overall security level of the web application by e.g., preventing the application to be displayed in an iFrame (Clickjacking attacks) or not executing injected malicious JavaScript code (XSS attacks).

0.3% 2025-06-12
4.3 MEDIUM

The web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an attacker to trick a user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives. This could potentially reveal confidential information or allow others to take control of their computer while clicking on seemingly innocuous objects.

0.2% 2025-06-12
4.8 MEDIUM

Linked URLs during the creation of iFrame widgets and dashboards are vulnerable to code execution. The URLs get embedded as iFrame widgets, making it possible to attack other users that access the dashboard by including malicious code. The attack is only possible if the attacker is authorized to create new dashboards or iFrame widgets.

0.2% 2025-06-12